Reading Reflection on The Computational Beauty of Nature by Gary William Flake
Before reading The Computational Beauty of Nature by Gary William Flake, I honestly never connected nature to computer programs at all. In my mind, computers were something artificial that humans fully control, while nature was something completely different and separate. For example, when I write code, I usually think about building apps or solving clear technical problems, not about how birds move, how ants organize, or how weather behaves. This reading changed the way I see that. The author explains that we should focus “not with ‘What is X?’ but with ‘What will X do?’” (p. 5), and this made me realize that code can be used to study real life behavior, not just screens. He also says, “The goal of this book is to highlight the computational beauty found in nature’s programs” (p. 5), which helped me understand that many natural systems follow rules, just like programs. The idea that “simple units… when combined, form a more complex whole” (p. 4) made me think of things I see every day, like how traffic in Abu Dhabi sometimes looks chaotic even though each driver is just following simple rules. I do not feel the author is biased, because he supports his ideas using examples from many different fields like biology, economics, and computing. This also made me wonder how far we can really simulate nature before systems become too complex to fully control.
Another part that affected me was the discussion of reductionism and holism. The author defines reductionism as the idea that “a system can be understood by examining its individual parts” (p. 2), but he also explains that “the whole of the system [can be] greater than the sum of the parts” (p. 4), which is what holism means. This really connects to how I usually solve problems by breaking them into pieces, especially in programming, but it also shows why that is sometimes not enough. The ideas of agents and interactions also made a lot of sense to me, especially when the book explains that scientists study “agents … and interactions of agents” (p. 3). For example, one person in a group project is simple, but when many people work together, the result can become very different and sometimes unpredictable. The book also says, “Interesting systems can change and adapt” (p. 5), and this reminded me of how humans, over many years, gain experience, learn from their mistakes, and slowly improve. This reading even made me rethink my capstone idea. Instead of only building something purely technical, I started thinking about working on a project related to nature or real life systems, something that can actually make life easier or better, not just something that runs on a screen.
Assignment 1a – Code
Concept : My sketch simulates one simple agent moving over time, like one driver moving through traffic. The agent switches between two behaviors: random drifting and following the mouse. The switch happens only when a time cycle ends, and probability decides which behavior will happen next. The agent leaves a fading trail so we can see its full path and how small decisions over time create a larger pattern. The trail color changes using HSB color space, which means the color slowly moves through different hues instead of using fixed RGB values, and a timer bar on top shows how close the system is to switching behaviors.
Code Highlight : One part of the code I am proud of is the visual timer bar at the top of the screen. It shows the passage of time before the agent switches behavior, and it also changes color from green to red as the end of the cycle approaches. This makes the system easier to understand instead of hiding the logic.
// "timer" increases every frame // "currentLimit" is how long the current mode should last // Convert timer into a value between 0 and 1 let p = timer / currentLimit; // Change color based on progress: // 120 = green at start, 0 = red at end let barHue = map(p, 0, 1, 120, 0); // Set the fill color using HSB fill(barHue, 90, 100); // Draw the bar: // barW * p makes the bar grow as time passes rect(barX, barY, barW * p, barH, 7);
Embedded Sketch:
Reflection / Future Ideas : This project helped me understand how a very simple rule and one agent can create a long and interesting path over time. Instead of only seeing the current position of the agent, the fading trail shows the history of its movement, which made me think more about time and process, not just results. I also understood better how systems work in cycles, using a timer, and how behavior changes depending on simple conditions.
In the future, I would like to add more than one agent and see how their paths interact. I am especially interested in trying an example similar to traffic, where one agent (one driver) can create a big effect on the whole system, even though it is only one small part of it. I also want to experiment with different types of movement, like smoother motion or more natural behavior, and see how that changes the overall pattern.